b) the drawbeam was fitted after the last CoF inspection and i. a valid LT400 form has not been presented, or ii. the HVS certifier was not of category HVET or HMTD , or c) there is no valid certification label or plate attached to the vehicle as required in Table 8-4-1. 2. The certification label or plate: a) is not indelible, or b) is illegible, or c) is not complete, or d) is not attached to the drawbeam in an easily visible position, or e) does not match the vehicle, or f) has
fitted after the last CoF inspection and i. a valid LT400 form has not been presented, or ii. the HVS certifier was not of category HVET or HMTD, or c) there is no valid certification label or plate attached to the vehicle as required in Table 12-3-1. 2. The certification label or plate: a) is not indelible, or b) is illegible, or c) is not complete, or d) is not attached to the drawbeam in an easily visible position, or e) does not match the vehicle, or f) has obvious signs of
Reasons for rejection Condition 1. An engine, gearbox, transfer case, differential or other driveline mounting is insecure. 2. A driveshaft is bent or severely damaged. 3. A driveshaft flange: a) is insecure, or b) has a bolt or nut missing. 4. A driveshaft support bearing is: a) insecure, or b) worn beyond manufacturer’s specifications. 5. A driveshaft universal joint spider (cross) bearing: a) is worn so that the movement in the joint is beyond manufacturer’s
was fitted after the last CoF inspection and: i. a valid LT400 form has not been presented, or ii. the HVS certifier was not of category HVET or HMTD, or c) the drawbar is not fitted with a certification label (Table 8-3-1). 2. The certification label: a) is not indelible, or b) is illegible, or c) is not complete, or d) is not attached to the drawbar in an easily visible position, or e) does not match the vehicle, or f) has obvious signs of tampering, or g) has expired
modified or repaired, and : i. no LANDATA record has been entered, or ii. no valid LT400 form from a HVS certifier of category HVEC or HMCD has been presented. 4. A motor vehicle that has an airbag system removed or made inoperable and been certified as above does not: a) have all OE signs, lights, or other devices that indicated that the vehicle was fitted with an airbag removed, or b) if the signs, lights or other devices cannot be readily removed, have a label that indicates
separated. Hoses and other flexible tubing 11. A hose or other flexible tubing forming part of a compressed air or vacuum line does not comply with at least one of the standards in Table 5-1-2 (Note 3). Compressed air brake systems 12. The air brake of a vehicle first registered in New Zealand on or after 1 March 2007 that has a towing connection to tow an air braked trailer (or a tow connection fitted on or after 1 March 2007 ) is not capable of being connected to the air brake of the
Reasons for rejection Permitted equipment 1. A motorcycle is fitted with more than: a) two front fog lamps, or b) two rear fog lamps. 2. A retrofitted pair of fog lamps is not: a) fitted symmetrically, or b) fitted as far towards each side of the motorcycle as is practicable, or c) positioned higher than the dipped-beam headlamps. Condition (Note 1) 3. A lamp is insecure or contains moisture in the form of large droplets, runs or puddles . 4. A lens is missing, or has a hole
Reasons for rejection Permitted equipment 1. A forklift is fitted with: a) only one front fog lamp, or b) more than one pair of front fog lamps. 2. A forklift is fitted with more than two rear fog lamps. 3. A retrofitted pair of fog lamps is: a) not fitted symmetrically, or b) not fitted as far towards each side of the vehicle as is practicable, or c) positioned higher than the dipped-beam headlamps. Condition 4. A lamp is insecure or contains moisture in the form of large
Reasons for rejection Mandatory equipment 1. Where an interior fitting, control or surface has been added, removed, substituted or has deteriorated, the likelihood of injury to occupants has not been minimised. Modification 2. A modification (Note 1) affects an interior fitting, control or surface, and: a) is not excluded from the requirements for LVV specialist certification (Table 7-7-1), and b) is missing proof of LVV specialist or accepted overseas certification, ie: i. the vehicle is
Reasons for rejection Mandatory equipment 1. Where an interior fitting, control or surface has been added, removed, substituted or has deteriorated, the likelihood of injury to occupants has not been minimised. Modification 2. A modification (Note 1) affects an interior fitting, control or surface, and: a) is not excluded from the requirements for LVV specialist certification (Table 7-7-1), and b) is missing proof of LVV specialist or accepted overseas certification, ie: i. the vehicle is
